Showing posts with label halloween postcards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label halloween postcards. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

There's Something about a Bernhardt Wall Jack-o'-Lantern...

Gibson artist Bernhardt Wall died in 1956.

He was a rather old man by then, having been born in 1872.

He was a Gibson artist who designed more than 5,000 postcards and was known as the "Postcard King" during his lifetime.

So if you've looked at old postcards in a flea market, you've almost certainly seen his work.

I like the zest of his Halloween cards, his brash use of jarring color and his playful sense of composition.

Wall's anthropomorphic jack-o'-lanterns are pretty distinctive.

Unfortunately, when you do a Google search for his work, you will see some cards featuring pretty awful racial stereotypes. This is a small number of his cards and they don't seem to be particularly malicious. But they are offensive. I know a lot of black collectors love those sorts of things. For example, S. Epatha Merkerson has a large collection of this sort of artistic production, and has a great explanation of why she collects such works. (I just found this out because she was featured in a design book I recently read about showcasing one's collections.)

Here are a just a few of the Wall postcards that caught my eye just now. If you do a Google image search, you'll find thousands more. He illustrated all the holidays and designed occasional cards as well.

The card with the raven pun is probably not actually a Halloween card, but it seemed to fit the holiday thematically (via Poe).













Sunday, October 24, 2010

"The Bogie Man" Postcard (J.I. Austen Co, Chicago, Early 20th Century)


"Two sunbonnet babies and a Jack-o'-Lantern titled 'The Bogie Man'."



The sensibility of the art looks strangely postmodern to me.

It looks like someone contemporary "misquoting" earlier art.

Yet it's genuinely old. Circa 1903-1905, one seller guessed.

Very strange one!

Why do I feel Joe Brainard would love this one?

Would love sampling images from it anyway...

I thought it was pretty rare, but maybe it was popular in its time, since I found a second card for sale, a little worse in the wear (this one advertised as "mint" funnily enough).

I'd go with the first one. Even with the slightly frayed corners, the image itself looks cleaner.And it's selling for a third of the price of the other one. Note how different the colors appear. That could be differences in the technology used to take the photos, or it could be variations in the card itself due to the printing process. Who knows.

What did your momma tell you about shoppin' around?